Mashburn v. North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 3
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
The testimony developed the fact, as is stated in the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice HART, that the State of Missouri had laid out and unproved a highway from Kansas City, in that State, to a point on the Missouri line near Mammoth Spring, in this State, and it is just here that I think the engineer of the district fell into error. He evidently thought it would be a good idea to extend this road as far as possible into this State; but that purpose, however laudable, was not authorized by the act of the General Assembly authorizing the improvement.
The purpose of the act under review was to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kern v. Booneville & Sanatorium Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Plum Bayou Levee District v. Pocket Cypress Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924