Legal Opinion · Dissent

James Talcott, Inc. v. Allahabad Bank, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1971No. 29464Published

1DissentAinsworth, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) :

I am in agreement with much of the excellent majority opinion. However, I dissent from that portion of the opinion which affirms the granting below of summary judgment, based on the plea of collateral estoppel by judgment of the Indian Banks (Allahabad, Baroda and Tokyo) against City Trade & Industries, Ltd.

Thus on summary judgment, without a requested jury trial on the merits, and despite strenuous contentions of CTI as to important disputes on material facts, CTI is barred from claiming a large in-terpleader fund of $622,367.76 plus interest, on the basis of a New York State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Rachal v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API