Legal Opinion

Barton v. Delfgauw

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 1, 2024No. 3:21-cv-05610Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 NATHEN W. BARTON, CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05610-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY 12 v. JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS (DKT. NO. 13 JOE DELFGAUW et al., 397) AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 Defendant. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement on Defendants’ 18 Counterclaim. (Dkt. No. 397.) For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED. 19 II BACKGROUND 20 This is a long running action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). 21 Plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Ross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API