Legal Opinion

Morgan v. INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH CARE, INC.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 29, 2011No. 20091044-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOROS, Judge:

11 Midge Morgan appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of In-termountain Health Care, Inc. and others (collectively, IHC). The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground that Morgan could not establish a prima facie case of medical malpractice without a designated medical expert. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 Many of the facts of this case are in dispute. Because this appeal arises from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of IHC, we recite the facts in the light most favorable to Morgan, except as noted. See Neff v. Neff, 2011 UT 6,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Neff v. NeffUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Butterfield v. OkuboUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dalley v. Utah Valley Regional Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. KillebrewUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Lawrence v. Mountainstar HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Berger v. Ogden Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Advanced Forming Technologies, LLC v. Permacast, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Lane v. Provo Rehabilitation and NursingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API