Legal Opinion

Fee & Nesbitt v. Florida Sugar Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, C. J.:

Appellants were plaintiffs in the Circuit Court, and appellee was defendant. The suit was instituted in 1891 for drilling an artesian well, 402 feet, at $2.50 per foot, by plaintiffs for defendant, amounting to the sum of $1,005. The account filed with the declaration is credited with $53, leaving a balance of $952. The declaration also contains counts for $952 for work and material provided by plaintiffs for defendant; for money paid by plaintiffs for defendant, and for money found to be due plaintiffs from defendant upon an account stated between them. The plea was the general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fowle v. Common Council of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Wilkinson v. Pensacola & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McCormickSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Mugge v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Sullivan v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  5. Ingram v. Jacksonville Street RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API