Legal Opinion
Applied Information Management, Inc. v. Icart
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1997No. 1:94-cv-05846PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
ROSS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Applied Information Management, Inc. (“AIM”), has brought this action against defendants Daniel P. Icart and Brownstone Agency, Inc. (“Brownstone”) alleging copyright infringement, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets, and breach of contract claims against both defendants in connection with Icart’s modifications of certain computer software that AIM had provided to Brownstone. Defendant Brownstone has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on all of AIM’s claims. For the reasons described below,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jeffrey Milstein, Inc., D/B/A Paper House Productions v. Greger, Lawlor, Roth, Inc., D/B/A Triangle EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krause v. Titleserv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Softman Products Co., LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Evolution, Inc. v. SunTrust BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Krause v. Titleserv, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Krause v. TitleservCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005