Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Office of Child Support Enforcement

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 10, 1997No. CA 96-1147PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Terry Crabtree, Judge.

Appellant Kenneth Blankenship argues that the trial court erred by exercising personal jurisdiction over him for a paternity complaint when the mother testified that the conception occurred outside of Arkansas. Further, appellant argues that the trial court erred in refusing his motion to dismiss — based on a dismissal of an earlier complaint for lack of the statutorily required evidence — on the theory of res judicata.

Appellant has defended three separate actions regarding this paternity suit.

The first paternity action was brought by the Office of Child Support…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Coleman's Service Center, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Spears v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. James Wesley WARD, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS STATE POLICE, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moon v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API