Legal Opinion

People v. McIntosh

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1980No. Docket 47083PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pled guilty to armed robbery and felony firearm, contrary to MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797 and MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2).

On appeal defendant asks this Court to remand his case back to the circuit court for resentencing because defendant was not present in the judge’s chambers at a presentencing conference. People v Briggs, 94 Mich App 723; 290 NW2d 66 (1980), and People v Worden, 91 Mich App 666; 284 NW2d 159 (1979), hold contrary to defendant’s position.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WordenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. BriggsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MatzatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. GascoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. BellafantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. BellafantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. MatzatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API