Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Hoyt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.

After giving to his wife his household goods, personal effects, and other articles of like nature, the testator gave the rest of his property to trustees, to pay the net income to his wife during her life. From and after her decease they were to pay her niece an annuity for life, and as soon as might be after his wife’s decease they were also to pay certain money legacies, one of which, of ten thousand dollars, was upon a condition, and immediately after his wife’s decease to set apart a trust fund of five thousand dollars for one of his nephews. The sixth clause of the will gave two third…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibbens v. GibbensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Minot v. PurringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Patton v. LudingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cushman v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Hale v. HobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Barker v. MonksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API