Legal Opinion

Nemorofskie v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 24, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Thirteenth District. Action by Gedilia Nemorofskie, by guardian, against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed conditionally.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

This is one of the ordinary actions to recover personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while alighting from one of defendant’s cars. Upon the trial it developed that the plaintiff was an infant, and a guardian ad litem was appointed by the court. Prior to this fact having been shown, the plaintiff had been allowed to show, over defendant’s objections and exceptions, that he had been earning the sum of $15 per week, and had been unable to work for a period of six weeks by reason of his injuries. Plaintiff obtained a judgment for the sum of $150 damages. There was no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lieberman v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yarrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. Jackson v. CogganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API