Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Yakima County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 12, 2011No. 29568-1-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 — Conrad Pierce appeals the trial court’s dismissal under the public duty doctrine of his negligence claims against Yakima County (County). Under the doctrine, the government may not be sued for negligence unless it breaches a duty owed particularly to the plaintiff rather *795than to the public in general. Mr. Pierce contends the trial court erred in failing to apply the “failure to enforce” and the “special relationship” exceptions to the public duty doctrine. Alternatively, Mr. Pierce contends remaining material facts preclude summary judgment on whether a special relationship has been…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. J & B Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Honcoop v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gorman v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. In re the Marriage of KimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Spokane County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Steven Oliver v. Henry W. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Gorman v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API