Kuether v. State

OPINION

Martha Hill Jamison, Justice ■

In two issues, appellant Erik Kuether challenges his driving while intoxicated *802(DWI) conviction. He complains that the State failed to disclose purportedly exculpatory evidence prior to trial. He also contends that the trial court erred in admitting his statements made before he was given Miranda warnings.1 Concluding that appellant has not shown prejudice from the State’s untimely disclosure of evidence and that the challenged statements were not made pursuant to custodial interrogation, we affirm.

Background

A woman and her cousin were driving home from…