Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. James
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 22, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1364PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
Eleven plaintiffs, all former Air Force officers who retired or separated from active duty before 1998 (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), seek judicial review of the denial of their petitions for retrospective promotion by the Air Force Board of Correction of Military Record (“AFBCMR” or “the Board”). Determining that each petition was submitted well after the three-year statutory limitations period applicable to such requests, the Board declined to waive the limitations period and denied each petition as untimely. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilbert v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Harkness v. Secretary of the NavyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2016
- Galvin v. HarkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Gilbert v. JamesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018