Center Art Galleries--Hawaii, Inc. William D. Mett v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals the district court’s order requiring the return of certain property pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The government makes three contentions: first, that the district court erred by holding that the search warrants which commanded seizure of the property were overbroad; second, that even if the warrants were over-broad, the district court should have denied the Rule 41(e) motion based on the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule; and third, that the district court should have applied the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.