Legal Opinion
Lanzano v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered May 13, 1993, which granted the motion by defendant City of New York ("the City”) for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR *3793212 dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint as precluded by res judicata and collateral estoppel and which denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion seeking the imposition of sanctions as against the City, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The underlying action, sought monetary damages for the alleged fraudulent concealment by the City of a disabling spinal injury sustained by plaintiff Thomas Lanzano…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Smith v. Russell Sage CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Karasik v. BirdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lanzano v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Abraham Sokol, Debtor. The State of New York, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Abraham Sokol, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Syllman v. NissanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Nardiello v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. BittorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.