Davis v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development, Office of Risk Management
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentThibodeaux, Chief Judge
hi dissent. While an appellate court must be deferential to the reasonable findings of a trier of fact, it is not compelled to slavishly adhere to those findings when the record, read as a whole, dictates otherwise. See Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Serv., 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 216. This is such a case. A careful reading of the entire record cries out for a reversal of this judgment.
Exclusion of Exhibits
The workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) erred in several procedural rulings that *978resulted in the exclusion of almost all of the parties’ evidence at trial.
At trial, Ms.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Frith v. Riverwood, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Campbell v. Luke Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Vernon v. Wade Correctional InstituteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.