Utilicorp United, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Dissent
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge,
dissenting.
I dissent from the majority opinion. The basis of my dissent is simple. Missouri law provides an exemption from sales and use tax for equipment “used directly in manufacturing ... or producing a product”. Section 144.030.2, RSMo. I do not believe that the transmission and distribution of electricity can be artificially distinguished from the generation of the electricity for purposes of defining the manufacturing or production of the “product” subject to the sales and use tax exemption.
The distinction made by the majority is not one expressly stated in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. WanamakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- City of Ames v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Curry v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- City of Louisville Ex Rel. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.