Legal Opinion

Antonio v. Thornell

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-08037Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jack Donald Antonio, No. CV-24-08037-PCT-JAT 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 Ryan Thornell, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The 16 Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned issued a Report and Recommendation 17 (“R&R”) recommending that the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice because 18 the one ground for relief raised in the Petition is procedurally defaulted without excuse. 19 (Doc. 17). Neither party has objected to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rasiah v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Hyundai America, Inc. v. Meissner & Wurst GmbH & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API