Legal Opinion
Northumberland County Retirement System v. GMX Resources, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 16, 2011No. CIV-11-520-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [Doc. No. 54], Defendants have timely responded to the motion, and Plaintiffs filed a reply.
Background:
In this action, Plaintiffs assert claims based on alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77l, and 77o. Plaintiffs seek to represent a putative class consisting of all purchasers of GMX Resources, Inc. (“GMX”) common stock pursuant or traceable to GMX’s public offerings in July 2008, May 2009, and October 2009. The only claims asserted in the Petition are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Penteco Corporation Limited Partnership--1985a, an Oklahoma Limited Partnership v. Union Gas System, Inc., a Kansas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Hafter v. Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Breuer v. Jim's Concrete of Brevard, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Karnes v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Niitsoo v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2012
- Christians v. KemPharm, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2017