Legal Opinion

Vaught v. Scottsdale Healthcare Corp. Health Plan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2008No. 06-15507PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BEA.

*622IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Raymond Vaught appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Scottsdale Healthcare Corp. Health Plan (the Plan), Vaught’s health plan. The Plan is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). After denying Vaught’s claim for benefits, the Plan declined to grant Vaught’s requests for internal review of that denial. Vaught then challenged the Plan’s denial of benefits in district court based on a new theory.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Scott v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. MacK v. KuckenmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Cheryl Wallace v. Oakwood Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Bilyeu v. Morgan Stanley Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API