State v. Daniel
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentTyson, Judge
The State does not challenge any of the findings of fact contained in the trial court's order. These unchallenged findings of fact support the trial court's conclusion of law that Trooper Berrong did not possess probable cause to arrest Defendant for driving while impaired ("DWI").
The State's appeal challenges only the trial court's conclusion, granting Defendant's motion to suppress the evidence obtained subsequent to his arrest for DWI. The majority's opinion concludes probable cause existed to support Defendant's DWI arrest, reverses the trial court's order and remands for further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.