Legal Opinion

State v. Van Valkenberg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1972No. C-71-09-2921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of illegal sale of a dangerous drug. Former ORS 475.100. He was sentenced to a maximum term of five years’ imprisonment. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the court was “guilty of abuse of discretion in not permitting the defendant * * * to withdraw his plea of guilty prior to sentencing.”

In a number of recent cases we have pointed out that ORS 138.050 limits the scope of direet appeals from a judgment of conviction based upon a guilty plea to matters pertaining to the sentence. State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970); State v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrudosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. SlopakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. KabachenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. WickenheiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. KlenkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API