Seawell v. Crawford
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
At Law. Actions of ejectment by J. Hairston. Sea well and others against. Haney Crawford and others. On motions to set aside default judgments in favor of plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
SAGE, District Judge.
These cases are before the court on motions filed August 27, 1892, to set aside default judgments taken *730December 16, 1891, and for leave to file answers to tbe amended petitions. The motions are made under section 5354 of tbe Ohio Revised Statutes. There having been no trial by jury, section 726 of tbe Revised Statutes of tbe United States does not apply, and tbe practice may be according to tbe state law. Clark v. Sohier, 1 Woodb. & M. 368. Tbe term at which tbe judgments were taken closed on tbe first Monday of June, 1892. The original petitions were filed in 1889, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. Saratoga RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Stevens v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Cohen v. HamillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Cavenaugh v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Kostendader v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nye v. Bill Nye Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905