Legal Opinion
Juzek v. Hackensack Water Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 5, 1966PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Haneman, J.
This appeal involves the effort of Hackensack Water Company (Hackensack) to condemn 26 acres of land owned by Robert and Anna Juzek (Juzeks).
Hackensack is a public utility corporation which provides water in Bergen and Hudson Counties. The main source of its supply is the Hackensack River which flows southward into New Jersey from New York. The water requirements of this territory have increased in recent years due to the industrial and population growth of the area. In order to fully develop the potential of the river to adequately serve…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gilchrist v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Board of Education of Choctaw County v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- McManus v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- School District No. 3 v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lomarch Corp. v. Mayor of EnglewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Borough of Lavallette v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection & Cibageigy Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Buchholz v. Board of Adjustment of Bremer CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- In Re Applications of North Jersey Dist. Water Supply Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.