Davis v. Piedmont & Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
The decisions in this State have been very insistent upon the principle that a pedestrian voluntarily using a live railroad track as a walk-way for his own convenience is required at all times to look and to listen, and to take note of dangers that naturally threaten and which such action on his part would have disclosed, and if in breach of this duty and by reason of it he fails to avoid a train moving along the track and is run upon and killed or injured, his default will be imputed to him for contributory negligence and recovery is ordinarily barred. Wyrick v. R. R., 172 N. C., 549; Ward…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Bullock v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Sawyer v. Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hinshaw v. . PepperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Barney L. Cagle v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957