Legal Opinion

Ryall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Circuit Court of Marengo.. Tried before the Hon. Vn. E. Clarke.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The defendant, upon indictment, was convicted of selling spirituous liquors to a person of known intemperate habits, in violation of section 4205 of the present Code of Alabama, as amended by the act approved February 26, 1881. — Acts 1880-81, p. 50.

The evidence tended to show that defendant sold what is commonly known as “Brandy Peaches,” and “Brandy Cherries,” put up in bottles, and preserved in liquor which was spirituous and intoxicating.

The court charged the jury that, upon this state of facts, if they believed this phase of the evidence, they might find the defendant guilty, as charged…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Petteway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Union Metallic Cartridge Co. v. Teague, Barnett & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API