Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1996No. A96A0236PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Frank Ellis Scott appeals his conviction for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine.

1. Scott asserts that the trial court erred in excusing a prospective juror who was the brother of Scott’s long-time girl friend and the uncle of Scott’s two children. While the juror answered affirmatively that he would be able to arrive at an impartial verdict based solely upon the evidence and the law as presented during the proceeding, the trial court granted the State’s motion to excuse the juror for cause. This was not error.

In determining whether a juror can impartially decide a case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Crowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Lively v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Mulvey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Whitman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API