Legal Opinion

Richards v. Meissner

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided June 19, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On motion to require a witness before a commission to answer questions.

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in equity under Rev. St. § 4915 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3392], pending in the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Missouri.

The complainants having completed their proofs, the defendants proceeded to take the testimony of the defendant Meissner, the patentee, before an examiner, under equity rule 67. Upon cross-examination, the witness was interrogated in relation to British patent 2,182 of 1875 to one Lake, for the purpose of proving that the invention patented to the witness had been anticipated by that British patent, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richards v. MeissnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API