Legal Opinion

Thorbus v. Hobby

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 6, 1954No. 16010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOLIN, District Judge.

This is an action to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare in which it was determined that the plaintiff herein was not entitled to old-age insurance benefits. *869Plaintiff applied for the benefits on the grounds that he was a self-employed person. There was no dispute that plaintiff had paid the self-employment tax for! the necessary period. The Bureau denied his claim on the basis that his alleged self-employment income was “income from real estate rentals” and, hence, did not bring the plaintiff under the benefits of the Act. At…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. BeaumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anna Conklin v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  2. Rafal v. FlemmingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
  3. Hudson v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963
  4. Perkins v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API