Thorbus v. Hobby
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
TOLIN, District Judge.
This is an action to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare in which it was determined that the plaintiff herein was not entitled to old-age insurance benefits. *869Plaintiff applied for the benefits on the grounds that he was a self-employed person. There was no dispute that plaintiff had paid the self-employment tax for! the necessary period. The Bureau denied his claim on the basis that his alleged self-employment income was “income from real estate rentals” and, hence, did not bring the plaintiff under the benefits of the Act. At…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. BeaumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anna Conklin v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Rafal v. FlemmingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
- Hudson v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963
- Perkins v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961