Legal Opinion

DeBergalis v. DeBergalis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record supports the determination of the Judicial Hearing Officer that defendant’s conduct prolonged this litigation, thereby justifying the award of counsel fees in the amount of $7,250.98 (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rósete, 70 NY2d 879; Rados v Rados, 133 AD2d 536). Contrary to defendant’s assertion, "[ijndigency is not a prerequisite to an award of counsel fees” (DeCabrera v CabreraRosete, supra, at 881).

We reject defendant’s contention that the denial of plaintiff’s application for an award of temporary maintenance during the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Rados v. RadosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wipperman v. WippermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. DeBergalis v. DeBergalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API