Legal Opinion

Engineering Dynamics, Inc. v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 2005No. 05-CA-295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge.

| ^Plaintiff, Engineering Dynamics, Inc., (hereinafter “EDI”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting an exception of lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendant, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (hereinafter “MIT”). For reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

Plaintiffs instituted this suit by the filing of a petition for injunctive relief against defendant, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In its petition, it alleged that they entered into a non-Exclusive Copyright License Agreement which obligated MIT to deliver the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ByrdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Iberiabank v. ThorntonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Edi v. MitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API