Engineering Dynamics, Inc. v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge.
| ^Plaintiff, Engineering Dynamics, Inc., (hereinafter “EDI”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting an exception of lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendant, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (hereinafter “MIT”). For reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
Plaintiffs instituted this suit by the filing of a petition for injunctive relief against defendant, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In its petition, it alleged that they entered into a non-Exclusive Copyright License Agreement which obligated MIT to deliver the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. ByrdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Iberiabank v. ThorntonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Edi v. MitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005