Saar v. Finkin
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mills District Qourt. — Hon. H. E. Deemer, Judge. The issues in this case involve the ownership of certain personal property levied upon at the instance of plaintiff, as the creditor of John Finkin. Intervenor avers that he owns the property, and asks its release from the levy. Judgment for plaintiff, and intervenor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
This case -was before this court on a former appeal, and the opinion is to be found in 71 Iowa, at page 425. At that hearing the judgment was reversed because of an erroneous instruction. At the next trial the cause was submitted to the court, without a jury, on the written testimony and records of the former trial, by stipulation. The only error assigned is that the judgment of the court is not sustained by the evidence.
The rule that, in a law action, where there is a conflict of evidence on which the 'finding of the court or the verdict of the jury rests, we cannot interfere, is well…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Clark v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Brown v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- First National Bank v. MurthaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Roe v. McCaughanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901