Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Hobby

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 31, 1953No. Civ. No. 6913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ-NAZARIO, District Judge.

As the Court stated in its order of October 24, 1952, in this case, the Administrator, in his decision subject of review herein, concluded that plaintiffs’ status as legitimate or illegitimate children had to be ascertained as provided for in Section 216(h) (1) of the Act, Title 42 U.S.C.A. § 416(h) (1) and that, inasmuch as the insured individual at the date of his death, was domiciled in Puerto Rico and that, as of said date, Puerto Rico did not figure in the term “State”, as defined in Section 210 (h) of the Act, Title 42 U.S.C.A. § 410(h), plaintiffs’ rights…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberto Robles, by His G.A.L., Pablo Robles v. Marion B. Folsom, Federal Security AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Flores v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1964
  3. Gonzalez v. Hobby, Federal Security AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  4. Rivera v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966
  5. Vazquez v. RibicoffDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API