Legal Opinion

Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1952No. 33848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSxjtton, C. J.

1. Error is assigned, in special ground 4 of the motion, on the refusal of the trial judge to give a written request to charge as follows: “The fact that defendant in this case dismissed the cross-bill for overdrawn commissions does not mean that plaintiff is not liable for overdrawn commissions to defendant.” The plaintiff’s attorney in his opening statement to the jury had said that the cross-bill was a scheme to defeat the plaintiff’s case; that the plaintiff did not owe the defendant for overdrawn commissions; and that the fact that the defendant withdrew, and dismissed the counterclaim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adkins v. FlaggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Purvis v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Findlay v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Atlanta Stove Works, Inc. v. HollonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Rogers v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Banks v. KildayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API