Legal Opinion

Blank v. Borden

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1974No. L.A. 30159Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

In the instant case we confront the question whether the familiar withdrawal-from-sale provision in an exclusive-right-to-sell contract between an owner of real property and a real estate broker exacts an unlawful penalty within the meaning of sections 1670 and 1671 of the Civil Code. We conclude that it does not. In so holding, we decline defendant-owner’s invitation to extend into this area the rule of Fracasse v. Brent (1972) 6 Cal.3d 784 [100 Cal.Rptr. 385, 494 P.2d 9], which limited to quantum meruit the recovery of an attorney discharged without cause in spite of a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API