International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, and Its District Lodge 100 v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether a district court has jurisdiction to enter a status quo injunction in a minor dispute 1 under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (RLA), pending the outcome of a grievance which is being arbitrated. We rule that, absent exigent circumstances not present in this case, “[n]o court of the United States [has] jurisdiction,” to entertain such an action. 29 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.
Factual background
Appellees in this case, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, and its District Lodge 100…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tejidos De Coamo, Inc., Etc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Csx Transportation, Inc. v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Railway Labor Executives Ass'n v. Chesapeake Western RailwayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio (Iam), Iam District Lodge 143 v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.