Rasch v. Moore
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari. An infant cannot be a bailiff (Oro. Eliz. 637), nor an attorney (Co. Litt. 128 a), nor administrator (Lovelace 161; Godolphin 103), nor judge or juror (Co. Litt. 36), nor burgess or alderman (Rex v. Garter Cowp. 220), nor hold any office of responsibility or trust (Guokson v. Winter 2 Man. & Ry. 313), nor be clerk of a court (Glaridge v. Evelyn 5 B. & Aid. 81), nor serve writs: Tyler v. Tyler 2 Root 519; Harvey v. Hall 22 Yt. 211, and see Edgerton v. Barrett 21…
Read the full summary
Certiorari. An infant cannot be a bailiff (Oro. Eliz. 637), nor an attorney (Co. Litt. 128 a), nor administrator (Lovelace 161; Godolphin 103), nor judge or juror (Co. Litt. 36), nor burgess or alderman (Rex v. Garter Cowp. 220), nor hold any office of responsibility or trust (Guokson v. Winter 2 Man. & Ry. 313), nor be clerk of a court (Glaridge v. Evelyn 5 B. & Aid. 81), nor serve writs: Tyler v. Tyler 2 Root 519; Harvey v. Hall 22 Yt. 211, and see Edgerton v. Barrett 21 Yt. 196; Vail v. Rowell 53 Yt. 109; Maynard v. MacCrellish 57 Oal. 355; Howard v. Galloway 60 Cal. 10 ; Weil v. Bent id.…
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff sued out an original writ of certiorari to review a judgment rendered by Justice P. W. A. Kurth, of Springwells, Wayne county, in favor of respondents, which he claims to have been fraudulently obtained, and also to be void for want of jurisdiction.
The affidavit for certiorari sets out that plaintiff was discharged in bankruptcy in 1876, and has since had no dealings with defendants; that on November 28, 1884, the elevator boy in the Buhl block, Detroit, handed him a paper which turns out to be a copy of a summons in favor of defendants against George H. Moore, issued by Justice…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Gadsby v. StimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wolpert v. NewcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Marr v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1907