Legal Opinion · Dissent

Craver-Hicks Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Vanlandingham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 16, 1969No. 6021Published

1DissentPreslar, Justice

I respectfully dissent, in that I would grant appellant’s Point of Error No. 7, complaining of the action of the trial court in directing a verdict for the Savings and Loan Association on appellant’s cross-action against it for indemnity and/or contribution. Appellant’s point is that fact issues were raised as to the causative negligence of First Savings & Loan Association. It is the writer’s opinion that the record supports this contention.

The jury found five acts of causative negligence on the part of appellant, Craver-Hicks Building Maintenance, Inc. Four of those issues involved waxing in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. TC Bateson CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Chamberlain v. North Central Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API