Legal Opinion

Keller v. Monarch Rubber Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1941No. 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LEMERT, PJ.

The defendant-appellant complains of the following errors intervening in the trial court:

I. In ordering a remittitur the court found the verdict to be based upon prejudice and should have set it aside.

2. Error in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and in refusing to give defendant’s requested charge No. 3.

3. Error in refusing defendant’s requested charge No. 4 and thereby removing the item of damages to feelings and mental pain and suffering.

4. Error in giving plaintiff’s request No. 2 which is wholly inconsistent with defendant’s request No. 1 which…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rady v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1986
  2. Angel v. ConstableOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API