Keller v. Monarch Rubber Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LEMERT, PJ.
The defendant-appellant complains of the following errors intervening in the trial court:
I. In ordering a remittitur the court found the verdict to be based upon prejudice and should have set it aside.
2. Error in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and in refusing to give defendant’s requested charge No. 3.
3. Error in refusing defendant’s requested charge No. 4 and thereby removing the item of damages to feelings and mental pain and suffering.
4. Error in giving plaintiff’s request No. 2 which is wholly inconsistent with defendant’s request No. 1 which…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Rady v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1986
- Angel v. ConstableOhio Court of Appeals · 1943