Legal Opinion

Wesley v. Bingel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries as well as the fact that he under*1011went two operations on his back were fully known by defendants long before plaintiff sought leave to amend his complaint by increasing the ad damnum clause. Under these circumstances and absent prejudice to defendants the grant of such leave was proper. (Barner v Shook, 51 AD2d 855.) Although plaintiff did not submit medical affidavits in support of his motion, he did include letters from the attending physicians which fulfilled the same purpose. (Appeal from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Earner v. ShookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smart v. WozniakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Rosenberg v. New York University HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Drechsel v. Loblaw, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API