Curtis-Hale, Inc. v. Geltz

WEBSTER, Judge,

specially concurring.

I agree that the facts of this case distinguish it from Peninsular Fire Ins. Co. v. King, 282 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Young v. Travelers Ins. Co., 496 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); and Employers Self Insurers Fund v. Torres, 565 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). I reach this conclusion based upon the fact that here, unlike those cases, the workers’ compensation insurance policy expired by its own terms more than two weeks before claimant was injured. I believe that this fact requires an affirmance, notwithstanding the holdings in Peninsular, Young and…