Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1995No. 102548, COA No. 163510PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

547 N.W.2d 646 (1995)

450 Mich. 955

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Danny Joe MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 102548, COA No. 163510.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 27, 1995.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. However, we ORDER that the opinion of the Court of Appeals shall have no precedential force or effect. Reported below: 208 Mich.App. 495, 528 N.W.2d 819 (1995). It was unnecessary for the Court of Appeals…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BarajasMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mapes v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API