Legal Opinion

State ex rel. La Vigne Electric Co. v. Floyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1961No. Nos. 61-264, 61-265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A rule nisi in prohibition was issued in each of these cases. No return has been made by the respondent. We have therefore considered the allegations of the suggestion and the documents in support thereof. See State ex rel. Ginsberg v. Wiseheart, Fla.App.1960, 120 So.2d 810.

We hold that the suggestion makes a prima facie case. A trial judge may not grant a petition for rehearing addressed to a summary final judgment. Cf. Marans v. Stang, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 891.

Accordingly, judgment in prohibition is awarded, but we assume it will not be necessary to issue the writ.

HORTON, C. J., and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marans v. StangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. State ex rel. Ginsberg v. WiseheartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bramble v. GarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. C. M. Whitney Co. v. Mid-State Prestressed Concrete Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. State ex rel. Lavigne Electric Co. v. FloydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API