Legal Opinion

Primes v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 2004No. 2-04-177-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

BOB McCOY, Justice.

I.Introduction

A jury found appellant, Lloyd Nash Primes, guilty of aggravated assault and sentenced him to twenty years’ imprisonment. In one point on appeal, Primes complains that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for mistrial after the prosecutor “compared” him with Ted Bun-dy during the State’s closing argument at punishment. We will affirm.

II.Background Facts and Procedural History

During the punishment phase of the trial, a prosecutor for the State made the following jury argument:

You have to send a clear signal to people like this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Felder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. Alejandro Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
  3. Bobby H. Bouchelle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  4. Bobby H. Bouchelle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  5. Bobby Lee Vickery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API