Legal Opinion

City of South Miami v. Pytel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 1982No. Nos. 81-72, 81-91PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

The City of South Miami (City) and Dade County (County) have each appealed final judgments in favor of the Pytels based upon Mr. Pytel’s claim of injury arising from a trip and fall on the City’s sidewalk. Both the City and County challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. For the reasons stated, we reverse upon the County’s argument but affirm with respect to the City.

Mr. Pytel had just left his physician’s office when, while walking on a South Miami sidewalk, he tripped and fell receiving various injuries. There were no eyewitnesses to the event. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. PattySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Majeske v. Palm Beach Kennel ClubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Baro v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Roach v. RaubarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ricotti v. Key Largo Kamp GroundDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Xtra Super Food Centers, Inc. v. ValdesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API