Legal Opinion

Whether False Statements or Omissions in Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction Declaration Would Constitute a "Further Material Breach" Under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided December 7, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

Whether False Statements or Omissions in Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Declaration Would Constitute a “Further Material Breach” Under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 False statements or omissions in Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction declaration would by themselves constitute a “further material breach” of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441. December 7, 2002 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE VICE PRESIDENT * You have asked whether the Government of Iraq will have committed a “fur- ther material breach” of its international legal obligations, as that term is defined in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kosta P. Velis, Debtor-Appellant v. Mary Kardanis, Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. R. A. Peacock, M. L. Coffer, and H. J. Wilson v. Lubbock Compress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Wilburn S. Bruce v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Conroe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Union Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API