Legal Opinion
James G. Wiley Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided March 29, 1967No. P67/84; protest 64/23060 (Los Angeles)Published
1Opinion of the CourtRao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of anesthetic apparatus similar in all material respects to those the subject of the O.E.M. Corp. v. United States (50 Cust. Ct. 138, C.D. 2402), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O. E. M. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963