Legal Opinion

Doty v. Montana Commissioner of Political Practices

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2007No. DA 06-0754PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Russell L. Doty (Doty) filed two complaints before the Commissioner of Political Practices (Commissioner) alleging that Bradley Molnar (Molnar) and John E. Olsen (Olsen) violated campaign finance and practices laws by making false statements about Doty during Molnar’s campaign against him. The Commissioner, Gordon Higgins, found there was insufficient evidence to conclude that Molnar or Olsen violated such laws, and Doty subsequently filed a petition for judicial review, a complaint for declaratory judgment, and an application for mandamus challenging that decision in the First…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chovanak v. MatthewsMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Orr v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Helena Parents Commission v. Lewis & Clark County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. School District No. 29 v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Board of Trustees v. Cut Bank Pioneer PressMontana Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Puryer v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Beasley v. Flathead County Board of AdjustmentsMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mitchell v. Glacier CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Beasley v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. LeFer v. MurryDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API