Legal Opinion
Star v. Berridge
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to plaintiff against defendant Berridge, by denying defendant Berridge’s motion for summary judgment and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the remaining defendants against plaintiff.
The record reflects a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Berridge actually installed a lead shield as ordered by the New York State Department of Health. The affidavit of defendant Berridge’s expert physicist was properly considered on the issue of the amount of radiation emitted into…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. KennyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Bittrolff v. Ho's Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Claim of Riehl v. Town of AmherstNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Dick v. Sunbright Steam Laundry Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alnashmi v. Certified Analytical Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Gallina v. 7901-11 13th Ave. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Singer v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ferraro v. 270 Skip Lane, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Fuzaylova v. 63-28 99th St. Farm Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.