Legal Opinion

McCargar & McKay v. Federal Securities Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1930Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied December 2, 1930.

On Petition eor Rehearing

(293 P. 595)

COSHOW, C. J.

A very urgent petition for rehearing has been duly presented. Defendant urges in this petition consideration of its contention that the • complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against it. The former opinion of this court does not discuss that contention. No demurrer was filed to the complaint and for that reason every intendment and logical deduction favors upholding the complaint.

The contention that the complaint does not state facts sufficient may be raised at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garnsey v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Pardee v. . TreatNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Washburn v. Interstate Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Home v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API